Jordan Peterson WILL NOT Back Down from Maoist Inquisition – His Questions for YOU at Home
video: Jordan Peterson WILL NOT Back Down from Maoist Inquisition – His Questions for YOU at Home
Jordan Peterson recently issued a letter regarding the investigation by the professional Association of psychologists wishing to stripped him of his license in Canada, for his wrong think. His forceful response merits investigation, including the following questions for you to answer at home.
It may be of interest to you to note that all of the complaints against me: (1) were brought by people with whom I had zero clinical contact; (2) have nothing whatsoever to do with my function as a clinical psychologist (except in the broadest possible public sense); and, most importantly with regard to this letter, (3) that half of them involve nothing more than political criticisms of you or the people around you (with all the remainder being complaints generated because I dared state some essentially conservative philosophical beliefs).
As the enclosed documentation indicates, I am being investigated and disciplined for, among a few other reasons not germane to my present communication with you:
- retweeting Pierre Poilievre, the leader of Canada’s official Opposition;
- criticizing you, your former chief of staff Gerald Butts, New Zealand PM Jacinda Ardern and an Ottawa city councillor; and
- objecting to the Ottawa police threatening to apprehend the children of the trucker convoy protesters.
- What makes you think that something similar won’t happen to you, or to someone you know and respect or even love?
- What makes you think you are going to continue to be able to communicate honestly with your physicians, lawyers and psychologists (and representatives of many other regulated professions) if they are now so terrified of their regulatory boards that they can no longer tell you the truth?
- What are your children going to be taught when all their teachers (that’s a regulated profession, too) are so afraid of the woke mob that they swallow all the ideological lies that are now required of pedagogues — regardless if they believe what they are saying?
- Where are we going to be if we allow criticism of the public figures charged with the privilege of our governance to be grounds for the demolition of not only the critic’s reputation but their very livelihood?
- How far are we willing to go down this road, without forthright resistance?

0 Comments