UK ELIMINATES 800-Year-Old Jury System: Gulag Doors Swing WIDE Open
video: UK ELIMINATES 800-Year-Old Jury System: Gulag Doors Swing WIDE Open
The UK, the originator of jury trials, wants to eliminate this check on totalitarian rule, and hand over the reins to magistrates. What’s their reasoning? Well, it would cost less, be more efficient time wise, and speed up the queue of 70,000 cases they’ve manufactured by arresting people for naughty tweets, thus speeding the trains to the gulags they’ve been building.
Oh sure, they’ll leave murder, manslaughter, and rape cases to the jury, unless you’re one of the noble faith in which case you get an apology from being suspected of nefarious activities like being part of a Grooming Gang from the English elite, that’s the compromise they’re offering by removing this 800 year old tradition that acts as a check on their power.
But here’s something interesting, that dovetails perfectly to the UK. In the USSR, murderers, rapists, and thieves were seen as redeemable by the state, and treated with kid gloves compared to political dissidents who felt the iron hand of Soviet elites and the Communist party.
WHY? because if you disagreed with government, you had the ability to undermine their rule, their power. And in the end, that’s the whole point in selling your soul to an ideology, and a common murderer is no threat to your position as opposed to a satirist poking fun at your ineptitude and turning the public against you.
So, in totalitarian Britain, who cares if the people decide cases involving violent crimes, that’s fine. The inefficiencies can exist there.
BUT not if someone tweets out a naughty naughty. Not if someone might galvanize public opinion against us. We dare not risk allowing these people to go free, so we will farm out that trial to one of our approved magistrates.
That’s right, hand over the keys to the centuries old Justice System over to a single, state-salaried employee? The jury, my friends, is not a ‘bug’; it’s the ESSENTIAL FEATURE! It’s the unruly, un-co-optable, beautiful wrench thrown into the gears of the State’s smooth-running Oppression-mobile!
Twelve jurors are a mini-revolution in the box! They are the voice of the common man—the bloke who knows, deep in his bones, that the law is being used as a blunt instrument against a political rival, a noisy neighbour, or someone who dared to tweet a mean thing about the Supreme Leader’s new haircut!
A judge, no matter how wise his wig is, answers to the Minister of Justice! Remove the jury, and you have officially opened the AUTOMATED DOOR TO THE GULAGS! Every case will be judged through the lens of the Ruling Party Ethos! ‘Guilty of Standing Against the State!’—Verdict delivered faster than a hot cup of state-approved misery!
We keep the jury because they are OUR human shield! They are the necessary grit in the system, preventing the smooth, slick, and terrifyingly fast slide into a totalitarian abyss! They are the last, best hope for ensuring that ‘Justice’ remains a word for fairness, not just a synonym for what the State wants! KEEP THE JURY! Long live the beautiful chaos of citizen judgment!”
Picture it—state-appointed judges, those robotic enforcers of the ruling party’s woke whims, rubber-stamping convictions like they’re approving expense reports. Next thing you know, it’s gulag o’clock for anyone who dares tweet “Oi, mate, that’s a bit much!” about the latest eco-tax or pronoun mandate.
They judges will be part of the machine. Defy Dear Leaders wishes, and you too will be put on trial by one of our favored and loyal magistrates. They’re being now not only paid to enforce the Ministry of Truth’s policies, but coerced as well. And the Orwellian automated doors to the gulags swing wide for dissenters like you and me!
That’s England’s trajectory. Prove me wrong.




0 Comments