Have you guys seen this? CNN just dropped a masterclass in how Orwellian propaganda and framing, without technically lying. (Hold up the image of the CNN tweet)

They posted: “Two Pennsylvania teenagers crossed into New York City Saturday morning for what could’ve been a normal day enjoying the city during abnormally warm weather. But in less than an hour, their lives would drastically change as the pair would be arrested for throwing homemade bombs during an anti-Muslim protest outside of Mayor Zohran Mamdani’s home. Here’s what we know so far.”

And they’ve got this sympathetic photo of one of these punks getting arrested, like it’s some tragic teen drama. Are you kidding me? These weren’t innocent kids out for a stroll—they were ISIS-inspired terrorists who drove to NYC specifically to hurl explosive devices at peaceful protesters! But CNN frames it like they just stumbled into trouble at an “anti-Muslim protest,” implying these jihadis were the anti-Islam bigots throwing bombs at the Muslim mayor. No, folks! The bombs were aimed at the PEACEFUL PROTESTORS, who were stating they weren’t fans of Islam, who had their point PROVEN, but CNN flips the script to confuse you, making the attackers seem like the victims and burying the ISIS angle. It’s intentional misdirection—leading you down a false lane where America-hating radicals get a pity party while real victims are ignored.

But CNN doesn’t want you to see a terrorist attack. They want you to see a “coming-of-age tragedy.” Notice how they frame it right next to the “Anti-Muslim” protest? They are trying to lead you down a very specific lane: that these boys were the victims of happen stance. not that they made the bombs and pledged allegiance to ISIS.

So, let’s go back in time and see how CNN might cover other unfortunate incidents.

[SEGMENT 1: 9/11] (Graphic on screen: A mock CNN tweet with a picture of a plane in a blue sky.)

First up, September 11th. CNN would have framed it like a bad Expedia review.

“Nineteen young men with dreams of flight boarded planes on a clear Tuesday morning, looking for a career change in the aviation industry. Their sightseeing tour of the Manhattan skyline took an unexpected turn as navigation issues led to a fiery conclusion. A day that started with travel goals ended with their lives being cut short in a workplace accident.”

CRITIQUE: See? No “terrorists.” No “Al-Qaeda.” Just some “young men” with “travel goals” having a “workplace accident.” This is how you sanitize evil.

[SEGMENT 2: THE ARIANA GRANDE BOMBER] (Graphic on screen: A mock CNN tweet with a concert background.)

Remember the Manchester Arena? CNN’s version would focus on the “equipment malfunction.”

“Salman Abedi was just a young music enthusiast heading to a crowded arena to experience the energy of a live performance. But before the final encore, his night took a drastic turn as an unexpected equipment malfunction in his backpack changed the lives of everyone in the lobby. What should have been a night of pop music ended popping sounds that effected all around.”

CRITIQUE: He wasn’t a bomber; he was an “enthusiast.” The bomb wasn’t an IED; it was a “backpack malfunction.” In CNN-land, the only victim is the narrative.

[SEGMENT 3: CHARLIE HEBDO] (Graphic on screen: A mock CNN tweet with a romantic image of Paris.)

How about the Charlie Hebdo massacre? Let’s give it that “Romantic City” flair.

“Two brothers were enjoying the romantic atmosphere of Paris, hoping to share their passionate views on art and editorial standards with some local journalists. In less than an hour, their intense creative differences with the staff at Charlie Hebdo led to a dramatic confrontation that would end their stroll through the city”, in defense of the faith they loved and gave their lives for.”

CRITIQUE: “Creative differences.” That’s what CNN calls it when you murder journalists for drawing a cartoon. It wasn’t an execution; it was a “stroll” that got “dramatic.”

[SEGMENT 4: TYLER ROBINSON] (Graphic on screen: A mock CNN tweet with a photo of a sunny rooftop in Utah.)

And finally, our favorite “peaceful” rooftop observer, Tyler Robinson.

“Tyler Robinson was simply enjoying the crisp Utah air and a peaceful afternoon sunning himself on a roof, looking for a moment of quiet reflection while resisting the encroaching creep of fascism. His weekend took a sharp turn when the local fascist was gunned down while debating the children impressionable minds his twisted words were meant twist. Now, his quiet life in the mountains has been replaced by the structured routine of death row.”

CRITIQUE: He wasn’t a murderer; he was a “resister of fascism.” He wasn’t caught; he was “interrupted during relaxation.”

Why is CNN ALWAYS on the wrong side? Why do they consistently frame villains as victims and try to confuse you about who the attacker really was? It’s simple: they’re not journalists; they’re activists with an agenda to tear down America from within. They protect radical ideologies—whether it’s ISIS sympathizers or race-baiting killers—because it divides us, weakens us, and pushes their globalist, anti-freedom nonsense. Every time, they lead you down that false lane, making you question if the bad guys are really that bad, while ignoring the blood on their hands.

CNN isn’t news. It’s a linguistic shield for the people who hate this country. They want you to feel sorry for the person holding the fuse while the rest of us are left cleaning up the shrapnel.