video: MSNBC CAUGHT: AI Turned Alex Pretti, ‘Pretty’ – Before/After Proof of the Psyop!

I want to prove to you that this is all one giant psyop aimed straight at your mind. Exhibit A: MSNBC, in their infinite wisdom, decided Alex Pretti wasn’t quite martyr material as-is, so they gave his photo the full Hollywood glow-up—making him noticeably more attractive. Why? Because humans are wired to feel more sympathy for healthier, better-looking specimens. It’s basic evolutionary psychology: we favor good genes for propagation, and we’re instinctively drawn to symmetry and vitality. (Or, as the media apparently sees it, ugly victims don’t trend well on cable news, as opposed to Luigi Mangione, the murderer they found leftists cheer for based on how attractive he is.

They didn’t just “improve clarity” by upscaling resolution—that’s impossible without new data (hello, GIGO: garbage in, garbage out). The only way to pull off these specific tweaks is with AI. Here’s the laundry list of cosmetic miracles they performed:

1. Gave him a healthy tan (because nothing says “tragic hero” like a beach-ready glow).
2. Straightened the bridge of his nose for that classic profile.
3. Turned his eyes from brown to piercing blue (because brown eyes apparently don’t tug heartstrings quite as hard).
4. Gifted him two brand-new, symmetrical ears (the originals were apparently too asymmetrical for prime time).
5. Perfected the jawline symmetry—original had one angular side and one rounded; now both are chiseled and even.
6. Broadened and pointed his chin for extra jaw strength.
7. Pumped up his hair, mustache, and beard with fuller volume, plus added multicolored follicles under the lip for that “rugged yet groomed” vibe.
8. Added color and definition to his lower lip (subtle, but it screams “approachable everyman”).
9. Installed a whole new set of perfect teeth—especially noticeable since the originals featured those two front teeth darker than the rest. They even raised his upper lip to flaunt the upgrade like a before-and-after ad.

Contrast this with Joe Rogan during the ivermectin panic: when CNN wanted to scare you off “horse paste,” they slapped a sickly green tint on him to make him look unhealthy and untrustworthy. (Nothing says “don’t listen to this guy” like turning him the color of moldy guacamole.) All to protect their pharmaceutical overlords, who pour billions into ad revenue. It’s the same playbook—manipulate visuals to shape perception and safeguard the cash flow.

Whether it’s beautifying a dead protester to rally outrage against ICE and Trump’s deportation push, or uglifying a podcaster to kill off a cheap alternative treatment, the goal is the same: divide the taxpayer pie, push ineffective (or worse) policies, and keep the NGO gravy train rolling before the Trump administration threatens to cut it off.

So why do they do it? Because their ideological overlords—or more likely, their financial ones—have skin in the game. The real winners here are anti-ICE activists, Democratic politicians, and progressive outlets like MSNBC, who amplify the backlash to mobilize voters, donors, and street theater ahead of elections or policy battles.

I’m just trying to be useful and show you how you’re being played—subtly, relentlessly, and with increasingly sophisticated tools. The media has pulled this crap for decades, but AI makes it blatant now. It’s a full-spectrum psyop war, and to the left, power is the only thing that matters—so they fight dirty, no apologies.

Bottom line: We’ve been conditioned since childhood to trust “the news,” but this should be the final nail in that coffin. Ditch the legacy media. Turn to independent sources you vet yourself. Whatever that looks like for you, it’s better than swallowing the filtered fairy tales.